Don't Miss a Thing
Free Updates by Email

Enter your email address

preview

powered by FeedBlitz

RSS Feeds



By Twitter: @thisissethsblog

Search

Google
WWW SETH'S BLOG

SETH'S BOOKS

THE DIP BLOG by Seth Godin




All Marketers Are Liars Blog




Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 08/2003

« Avoiding the Passion Pop Gulf | Blog Home | All the News That Fits (do what you're great at) »

More on passion and pop

The post about the gulf between passion and pop touched a chord.

A few readers remembered Geoff Moore’s classic Crossing the Chasm. This is a super book (particularly the original (used) edition, not the updated one). Geoff has a different take on the curves, but his approach is well worth a look, especially for technology related products.

A few other readers wrote in, pointing out that they are going for both. Both passion and pop because the flexibility of the web makes it easy to do that. Of course, it doesn’t, not really. Going for both is rarely the right strategy.

Most germane: the two humps are not static. They move. Sometimes you can move them (I think Apple did) and sometimes the market moves on its own (music, for example). Most businesses don’t have the patience or the resources to move the Pop hump on their own, and I think it’s usually foolish to try. Passion, on the other hand, is always fast moving, and if you have something extraordinary and there’s a cadre of believers, the passionate will find you.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b31569e200e552296f3d8834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference More on passion and pop:

» #87 - You can't do both from The Freak Factor
In my management and strategy classes I ask students this question. To maximize individual or company success, should you: Fix weaknesses Build on strengths Do both (fix weaknesses and build strengths) Which do you think is the most popular answer? [Read More]

« Avoiding the Passion Pop Gulf | Blog Home | All the News That Fits (do what you're great at) »